Fahd Izbal to book tickets for his travel by train from bridge of Allan, Stirling to London kings Cross for three months in advance to be on the safe side. The next day, he was at the station early for the first part of the trip, the service 06.01 website scotrail to Edinburgh. The train arrived, there was no mention of it on the scoreboard. The scotrail website told him that the service never existed at the chart and gave him virgin East coast, who sold him the ticket. Virgin admitted that was not a train.
Izbal was forced to take a ticket on another train for which his ticket was not valid and to explain to the security guard. He missed his connection in London and arrived 61 minutes.
He wrote for Virgo in may requesting a refund but received no response. “Their communication that day was in a deplorable state. I had to keep chasing to find out how I could get to my destination on invalid ticket, not kicked off the train,” he says. “I have reserved a seat in the quiet car for the Edinburgh to London leg, but because I missed the connection I had to squeeze in a loud and crowded train.”
Virgin never pay out. His franchise was filmed last month due to its poor performance and the state of the London North Eastern railway (LNER) took over the service. After the intervention of the observer, LNER agreed to refund the cost of the ticket and will offer a first-class ticket to any destination as goodwill.
Ordeal Izbal highlights the problems faced by the passengers in compensation for disrupted rail journeys. Passengers in the North, appeared in last month’s chart chaos reportedly refused to pay they were entitled, because they represent too many claims for the repeated delays.
The government has announced that season ticket holders in the most affected lines will be returned within one month of the fare on regular compensation. Ordinary passengers with ordinary tickets will miss out on the extra bounty, and there is no guarantee that they will receive the standard dues, either. Only a third of people claim the compensation they are entitled to when their journey was delayed. The rest are either to defer to the complexity of the system, or do not know that it exists at all.
Fahd Izbal booked the trip from Scotland to London, but was sold a train ticket that does not exist. Photograph: Katherine Anne rose for the observer
While the airline is governed by European law, which establishes regulatory levels of compensation for delays and cancellations, railroad operators to set their own payouts and rules vary widely. The result is that passengers have no idea when and how much they could claim, if they are studying the conditions of the operator, who travels with them.
Commuter trips from London to York for the service of the LNER, for example, would be entitled to 50% of the cost of one ticket if the train arrived 30 minutes later. If the operator of the Central they will get nothing at all. At the hour delay, LNER will refund the entire fare for the affected journey, and the Central only repays the full amount if the train arrives more than three hours later.
Last month, a private bill was submitted calling for faster and more generous remuneration is paid automatically when services are not disrupted. BIM Afolami, MP for Hitchin and Harpenden, won cross-party support for its demands, which include payment within five days. Currently, voters who are not able to get to work on time, had to wait up to 28 days for compensation as low as £2.
Passengers lost 3.6 m hours due to considerable delays in 2016-17, according to a study by consumer group which?, but 40% of drivers and 54% of passengers seats are not told of their rights to compensation. “The approach was absolutely woeful,” says Alex Hayman, Director of public markets at which?. “If the train can simplify overly complex systems of the claim for late customers, then the government should insist on the automatic compensation which should be introduced across the industry, so that people could get the money that they owe.”
While passengers suffer a violation of hours of work and lost business, train operators to rake in millions from their suffering. Every time something goes wrong with the infrastructure of the railway network compensates the impact of delays. The company received more than 2 billion pounds for cancellation and delays caused by bad weather, engineering works and other violations between 2011 and 2017, while over the same period, passengers were given only £187m in compensation.
In addition, a short delay to the service triggers an automatic payment of the railway companies, and passengers are forced to stay for half an hour and fill out two pages of forms before they qualify for the discount, which may take up to four weeks to arrive.
Rights of passengers when things go bad, there have been improvements, but since the Railways do not want to broadcast the fact that you have to plow under the Charter passengers on each operating company to know exactly how. In 2016, the rules were changed to allow travellers to claim compensation for delays, not the voucher but the national Rail conditions of travel, which set minimum standards for railway operators must comply, to require operators recover half of the cost of travel if it is delayed for more than an hour, and the fault lies with the operator. That includes any problems related to infrastructure, such as failure signals and leaves on the line.
Most companies now go above and beyond that voluntary delay repay scheme, under which payments for delays of 30 minutes or more, regardless of whether the company is to blame. However, each company has different policies depending on length of flight and type of ticket. The system is different in Northern Ireland, where the national conditions of carriage does not apply, and the delay to pay just compensation in the form of vouchers.
This year, some operators pay for delays of 15 minutes and one – s2s – gives automatic discounts on the smart card holders, if the train was late for two minutes.
While passengers suffer a violation of hours of work and lost business, train operators rake in millions. Photo: will Oliver/EPA
However, subscriptions with companies that do not propose to delay the repayment not eligible for individual journeys. Instead, they should hold out for a discount, reflecting the overall poor performance throughout the year when they are updated.
Even less is known about the quiet change in the rules, which allows passengers to claim for consequential losses if the interrupted journey requires them to take a taxi or buy a meal.
Previously, the conditions of carriage of the railway company is freed from liability if their clients were at a loss, but after going to that?, the law On consumer protection can now be applied to railway crossings, the holding company, if they do not fulfill their obligations with “reasonable care”. Potentially this could mean to travelers, arguing that the damages in case of failure in their place, they are protected, or if the onboard failed as well as for minor delays that cause side problems.
Will they get what they want is another matter. Operators still “poke a nose” for passengers, according to which?. He found that nearly half incorrectly tell passengers that they cannot claim reasonable expenses when their train is not running, and most do not inform them about their legal rights on their websites.
“This is the latest in a catalogue of railway companies treating their passengers with a stunning disregard”, says Hayman. “They were warned again and again about their responsibilities for ensuring their passengers get the money they owed when they fail to deliver, but they don’t act unless forced. The controller should start to show teeth and to take immediate measures of coercion, or the government has no choice but to intervene and to intercede for passengers and their rights.”
Passengers who have stalled when trying to recoup their losses currently have limited options for redress. Industry watchdogs concentrate Transport and London TravelWatch will take up unresolved complaints, but they have no authority to enforce decisions. This spring, the regulator, the Office of rail and road transport (ADR), has announced plans to build a schema of the Ombudsman with full legal authority, and require all train operating companies to sign up. However, it will not come into operation before the end of the year – too late for the people caught up in the fiasco schedules.
Dear officials, Northern railway routes are not ‘assets’ – your government | Lisa nandy
Campaign for better transport calls on the government to reform the system and control the more rapid adoption of smartcards, which, unlike paper tickets, can be automatically returned.
“We would like to additional compensation for delays over two minutes to be the best practices,” says campaign Manager, Stephen Joseph. “Currently, trains are in time if it arrives within five minutes of schedule, or 10 minutes if it is a long train. Two-minute threshold will encourage rail companies to measure their punctuality more”.
How to claim compensation for cancellation or delay
• Keep your tickets and receipt in case they are swallowed by the ticket barrier. You need to scan or to make a claim.
• See the passenger’s Charter of the train company running the service, to find out how, what and when you can claim. In online searching the company name and ‘compensation’ should take you straight to relevant information.
• You can find out the exact length of the delay in www.recenttraintimes.co.uk which records the arrival time of all services for the last three months. Fill in the claim form online, or you can request it at the station or by phone.
• You must apply within 28 days to determine.
• If your claim is rejected, write a formal complaint to the train company, citing the terms of its Charter. You can find the tool complaints www.resolver.co.uk. If this fails, you can take your case to the transport Focus, or if the journey was to London, to London TravelWatch.